103,188 Wikipedia Articles Preserved

The Beginning

HalfPrice emerged on the scene in 2001 and immediately stuck out as being one of the few bands that could put together a good song sustaining an impressive stage performance without ever compromising passion. They also became rapidly well known for their crazy antics and outrageous attitude towards life both on and off the stage.”

Pete and drummer #1 Gareth played together for a month or two before a chance meeting on the streets of Cape Town in May 2001 brought together founding members Pete and Markus (later to become the DFG). The main idea behind the band formation, besides their love of punk rock and ska music, was to create a platform where they could write creative entertaining music expressing their views about whatever issues they wanted to, be it offensive, completely ridiculous or plain light hearted content. At the same time they wanted to portray a 'not so serious' attitude towards life which they felt was sorely lacking in their everyday society and the local band circuit. In keeping with the idea of having as much fun as humanly possible, they deciding to call the band HALFPRICE.

Drummers 1-4

After the early departure of drummer number 1 ,Gareth, drummer number 2 Brett joined and so began the legacy of drummers. Brett had just moved down from Jo-berg after leaving what was then called the Vendettas and he became their new drummer. Brett could not remember any of the songs. Markus would shout "slow" , "fast" , "stop" after 2 months of playing the same 4 songs. HALFPRICE’s future with Brett seemed bleak so hey stopped phoning him and he didn't seem to notice or care-
Enter Drummer number 3 Geoff from Fungy Gone West and then LP Show. He was always meant to be temporary and only joined because HALFPRICE had a show booked (October 2001- Death of Pop) The organisers called them Bad Influence. Although people said they were pretty okay that night they enjoyed the show and Geoff stuck with them as a "permanent" drummer.

After much searching HALFPRICE secured more gigs at the whammy bar in Table view with My Latest Ex, every weekend for a month. Things seemed to be going well and Geoff had settled into the band nicely when one night at a show at the Purple Turtle (live venue in Cape Town), Geoff decided he didn’t want to play. Since HALFPRICE had organised the show and there was quite a good turnout they played a couple of songs with The Dirty Locals guitarist Steven on drums. Steve had never seen Halfprice play before let alone know their song, and the performance went down in history as the worst show ever.

The band seemed to be in its worst position yet and Pete didn't seem to care about anything anymore when out of the blue drummer number 1 Gareth decided to return. HALFPRICE was back on track and started writing new material. However, the return of Gareth ushered in an era of excessive drinking before, during and after shows, naked performances as well as swearing at underage kids and at each other.

It was during this period that Markus heard a crowd member say that HALFPRICE sucked and couldn't play their instruments because they were always so f*ucking drunk. This seemingly drunken outburst brought about a new era in HALFPRICE as they decided to prove people wrong.


Rebirth

This seemed to work well and HALFPRICE stuck to proving people wrong, playing some good shows, some free shows. The word started getting out and HALFPRICE started playing gigs with some of the bigger Cape Town bands like Hog Hoggidy Hog, New World Inside and The Rudimentals as well as touring bands from the Gauteng - Leek ATBU , Evil Eddies, Vendetta Cartell, Curb Dogs and Fuzigish.

At some stage during this period they "toured" Bloemfontein with Fuzigish and The Curb Dogs and experienced some exotic entertainment at the Eager Beaver. Details about the evening are still sketchy but the experience changed drummer Gareth's life forever. This led to the creation of the infamous "drunk punk" gigs.

Just as things seemed to be going really well for Halfprice and they had started to record an EP (BUSH, BIN LADEN and my MOM’S NOUGHT, Gareth (now drummer #4) got himself a job and went overseas leaving Pete and Markus with the task of finishing the EP.
Enter drummer number 5 - Luke :things just didn't quite work out.


The Machine

Enter drummer number 6 – Kyle he was only supposed to be temporary to help out finishing the EP and a show. After a dodgy first practice things started to sound good, in fact things were better than ever before. Kyle ,previously in a metal band, found that this punk vibe wasn't half bad and decided to stay on as a permanent drummer.

BUSH BIN LADEN AND MY MON’S NOUGHT (2002)

HalfPrice were back in action just in time to record the last two tracks for their upcoming EP and play their first gig with Hog Hoggidy Hog, New World Inside and the Rudimentals at the Mother City Alliance #3.

HalfPrice finished the EP production and released BUSH BIN LADEN AND MY MOM’S NOUGHT at a party at Dirty Dicks in Hout Bay. The EP is fast and furious and deals with drinking rather than studying or just being content to survive each day with a smile on the face and a beer in the hands, while bringing out HALFPRICE’s own brand of humour and satire and their ability to laugh at themselves.
The music really began to develop and infamy started to grow. Around about this time, the band were offered a clothing sponsorship deal by local alternative lifestyle label Kartal Industry Ware.

The band took a few months to adapt to Kyle's metal drum slogs but emerged as a stronger unit and this relationship was cemented during the next couple of months as Kyle fitted in perfectly and a unique friendship formed between the members. The band gigged and toured as much as they could afford to around Cape town and the rest of South Africa.

THE NEW GUY

After about a year Halfprice looked into recruiting a four member, another guitarist and backup vocalist. Enter Mr Rene Traut.

When Rene joined the band, everything changed. The music seemed to finally make sense and the band really began to progress in terms of song writing and technical skill. His first show as a member of Halfprice was also his unveiling as BIG GAY RENE to the world at large at a punk and ska festival called "Riot in the Madhouse" at Oudemoulen village, Cape Town where he played 5 songs in his undies. This was thhttp://en. .org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_bold.png
Bold texte final leg of the dirty underwear road trip where the band drove and gigged around South Africa in just their underwear.

TAKING LIFE SERIOUSLY

Halfprice began to plan to record a full length. It was around this stage that Halfprice launched a massive 10 day tour with Joburg band The Stevie Wonderfuls called "Under the Influence" playing shows in Cape Town, Durban, Joburg, Nelspruit, Pretoria etc.

After a frenzied rush to finish off the newer and latest songs the band headed up to Joburg to record "Taking Life Seriously". Finances were sorted out by the HUMAN WINKY who was kind enough to loan HALFPRICE some cash to finish the album. It was towards the end of the recording when a Johannesburg record label approached HALFPRICE.

RED AMBULANCE

HALFPRICE had been friends with legendary Joburg punkers Fuzigish for years. They were starting a record label and they wanted to sign Halfprice. TAKING LIFE SERIOUSLY was released on RED AMBULANCE records in September 2004. TAKING LIFE SERIOUSLY shows a more serious side to HALFPRICE with songs showing the pitfalls of excess and having to deal with the sometimes not so sunny side of South Africa. But through all of this, they still manage to maintain their characteristic sense of humour using satire and sarcasm to poke fun at the ambiguity of “serious” situations.

The launch party coincided with the release of their first music video “TAKING LIFE SERIOUSLY”. The next weekend saw Halfprice get interviewed by GO TV in Joburg where they went to release their CD, playing two rocking shows in Joburg and in Pretoria with the mighty Fuzigish
Halfprice also launched a new website at this stage and fed up with the high prices bands were charging for gigs decided to throw a string of R10 shows to promote TAKING LIFE SERIOUSLY .


BANNED FROM SOUTH AFRICA

With the growth of HALFPRICE’s infamy more and more venues were open to them to play. However, not all of these venues were prepared for the kind of entertainment HALFPRICE had to offer. Soon venues and festivals refused to let HALFPRICE play because they were too loud or too rude. The culmination came when premier live venue The Jam (later The Mercury Live) banned HALFPRICE from playing.

With venues in South Africa locking doors, HALFPRICE ventured north into Namibia in June of 2005 playing a sellout show in Windhoek. Fueled by this ,HALFPRICE then embarked on BANNED FROM SOUTH AFRICA: EUROPE TOUR in December of 2005.

MAD TOURING

2006 involved some mad touring. The decision was made to put out a new album in September, so in preparation HALFPRICE toured like mad taking them up the coast for 10 days with LP Show and then the next 5 months involved touring to Johannesburg, Pretoria, Durban, Grahamstown, East London, Namibia, PE and pretty much any town they hadn’t played in before.

July 2006 was time to record and even during this process, HALFPRICE continued to play shows in Johannesburg, Pretoria and Durban. At the end of a long 8 months of touring, HALFPRICE packed their bags again for a tour to Europe to promote the new album BANNED.

BANNED (2006)

Taking a slight departure from their previous album BANNED show strong influences of Operation Ivy, Rancid, NOFX, Guttermouth, Terrorgruppe and AC/DC. The HALFRICE foursome had now been playing together for 3 years and BANNED was a cementing of a new era of songwriting for the band. The tour to Europe, although long and challenging, did showcase a tighter more professional HALFPRICE and this was seen at their inclusion in the Popkomm festival in Berlin, Germany.

The Launch of BANNED in Cape Town turned into 2 huge events. When the doors opened at the all ages launch, there was a 600 strong crowd waiting in the rain to tear the walls apart. The over 18 show saw the ban from The Mercury being lifted and the venue was packed.

New Years 2007

2007 Began with a bang. Halfprice were invited to play at the Amphies new years party in Swakopmund in Namibia. When Halfprice was finally about to start playing the crowd of well over a thousand was so excited that not much could have held them back. Singing along to every song dancing, moshing and just having a good time, it didn’t take much for them to break completely out of control. A simple “I wanna see you right here in front of me, BREAK DOWN THE BARRIERS” from Pete was enough to almost cause the mob to riot.

The stage managers and hired security then stopped the gig demanding the crowd to behave and go back behind the barriers. Reluctantly, the crowd replied as they still wanted the show to go on. At this point as the DFG took the microphone and said: “If you can’t come to me, I’ll come to you”. He proceeded to leap off the stage running around in the crowd and over the barriers. The security division was not impressed and told Halfprice they could only play one more song. As Halfprice started playing, fans went absolutely crazy. Half way through the song, the security, fearing that the barricades would be broken down again, began to deploy pepper spray and tear gassed the roaring riot.

The purpose of this article is to explain the current implementation of monetary policy in the United States, as well as some of the financial details behind the current methods.

How money is created - Simplified
When money is deposited in a bank, it can then be lent out to another person. If the initial deposit was $100 and the bank lends out $100 to another customer the money supply has increased by $100. However, because the depositor can ask for the money back, banks have to maintain minimum reserves to service customer needs. If the reserve requirement is 10% then, in the earlier example, the bank can lend $90 and thus the money supply increases by only $90. The reserve requirement therefore acts as a limit on this multiplier effect.


Federal Reserve and Money Supply
The Federal Reserve has three main mechanisms for manipulating the money supply. It can buy or sell treasury securities. Selling securities would have the effect of reducing the money supply (because it accepts money in return for purchase of securities). Purchasing treasury securities would increase the money supply (because it pays out hard currency in exchange for accepting securities). Secondly, the discount rate can be changed. And finally, the Federal Reserve can adjust the reserve requirement

How Money is Placed into Circulation
Currently, the US government maintains over 800 billion US dollars in circulation throughout the world. Below is an outline of the process which is currently used to increase the amount of money in the economy, basically a summary of one of the most important functions of the Federal Reserve. The amount of money in circulation is generally increased to accommodate the growth of the country's production. This monetary policy is implemented by the Federal Reserve System - the quasi-public central bank of the United States.
# This first step is required for processes which occur later. Prior to expansion of the amount of money in the US Economy, we'll assume that Congress has - at some point - needed more money than it had taken in through taxes. In order to raise money, it increases the amount of the National Debt by ordering the creation of what laymen could refer to as an I.O.U. - typically, this will be a Treasury Bond (see Treasury security). It offers the "IOU" for sale, and someone pays cash to the government for that Treasury security. The Treasury securities generally do pay about 5% interest to the owner. It is these IOUs that will play a role later in the process. Note that sometimes your local bank is the one to buy the Treasury securities.
# The 12-person Federal Open Market Committee, consisting of the heads of the Federal Reserve System, meets eight times a year to determine how they would like to influence the economy. They create a plan called the country's "monetary policy" which sets targets for things such as interest rates.
# Your local bank goes through it's daily transactions. Of the total money deposited at banks, only a small bit of it ever is removed. So, banks decide to make use of this bulk of "non-moving" money by loaning it out. Banks do have a legal requirement to keep a certain percentage of money on-hand at all times.
# According to the estimates in its plan for the US Economy, the Federal Reserve places an order for money with the US Treasury Department. The Treasury Department sends these requests to its operations called the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (to make the paper dollar bills) and the Bureau of the Mint (to stamp the coins).
# The US Treasury sells this newly printed money to the Federal Reserve for the cost of printing. This is about 6 cents per bill (even the 100 dollar bills). Aside from the minimal costs, the only other obligation made is that the Federal Reserve has to simply pledge collateral for the money received.
# Every business day, the Federal Reserve System engages in what is called "Open market operations." If the monetary policy has planned to increase the amount of US dollars floating around, then they will hold small bidding contests to buy US Treasury Bonds from banks. So, the banks will send those government IOUs to the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve will send that newly printed money to the local bank. The reverse is often done as well, but generally, at the end of the year, there will be more money sent out to local banks, than money taken in from them.
# In trading, the Fed will have affected the available or "free reserves" of commercial banks in the country.
# Now that the local bank has more free reserves it loans out the money, because holding the money would amount to accepting the cost of foregone interest and commercial banks generally act to avoid such costs. This is how additional money is placed into the hands of the American public --- through bank loans.

In, summary, almost every US Dollar↑↑ anywhere in the world represents a current outstanding loan of some US citizen somewhere.

↑ Though the Federal Reserve Banks have been legally declared as private entities, the Board of Govenors which directs them is composed of seven Federal employees, whom are required to be independant of the banking sector.
↑↑ A very small amount of US money still exists as United States Treasury Notes, which differ from the money created by the Federal Reserve System. The official designation for the bills authorized by the Federal Reserve corporations are "Federal Reserve Notes."

Ramifications of the Economic Regulation Process
Occasional deficit spending is a requirement in a growing economy. The current economic process uses Treasury Securities which only exist when the nation is in debt. In 2005, the Federal Reserve held approximately 9% of the national debt in order to support the monetary base. Though gold was once the basis for the money supply, the government gradually transitioned away from precious metals and into the use of the National Debt as the economy's foundation. Experts are hopeful that other assets could take the place of National Debt as the fundamental basis, and Alan Greenspan, long the head of the Federal Reserve, has been quoted as saying, I am confident that U.S. financial markets, which are the most innovative and efficient in the world, can readily adapt to a paydown of Treasury debt by creating private alternatives with many of the attributes that market participants value in Treasury securities
There are costs associated with maintaining the money that is printed by the government. These costs arise in the form of the interest that US citizens are charged on the bank loans - loans which are required in order for money to be injected into the economy, and even simply for existing money to be maintained (as noted in "Step 8" in the above process). Note that in 2003, bank loans averaged an interest rate of 9%., which also closely matches the 9.84% average interest rate drawn from FDIC data spanning the 21 years from 1980 through 2001 .

By virtue of the economic process, more loans must be granted than are repaid every month in order to support the amount of US money in the world. If the total amount of loans were repaid to banks, then the supply of US dollars would be destroyed. While these are not secrets of the Federal Reserve System, these important steps appear to widely misunderstood, according to the volume of literature on topics such as "Federal Reserve conspiracy" and "Federal Reserve fraud."

An additional important ramification of this process is the fact that economic growth becomes coupled with debt, and this coupling is argued to create a social conflict, which may otherwise not exist.

Finally, the involvement of bank loans ties the economy to the problems of compounding interest. Many people theorize (including those at the Federal Reserve) that the amount of money is directly related to the value of each dollar . Thus, an exponential need for increasing amounts of money may be contributing factor towards inflation in the US. Inflation raises the cost-of-living for everyone, and if inflation exceeds the growth of income, then real wages decline.
The net effect is that citizens are effectively made poorer over time through no fault of their own.

Money supply, interest rates, and the economy
When interest rates go down, money supply increases. Businesses and consumers have a lower cost of capital and can increase spending and capital improvement projects. This is encourages growth. Conversely, when interest rates go up, the money supply falls and reins in the economy. The Federal reserve increases interest rates to combat inflation.

Criticism of monetary policy
Artificial Influences
Some free market economists, especially those belonging to the Austrian School criticise the very idea of monetary policy, believing that it distorts investment. In the free market interest rates will be set by saver's time preference. If there is a high time preference this means that savers will have a strong preference for consuming goods now rather than saving for them. Thus interest rates will rise due to the low supply of savings. With low time preference interest rates will fall. The interest rates send signals to businessmen as to what is worth investing in, low interest rates will mean that more capital is invested.

Monetary policy means that the interest rates no longer represent consumer time preferences and so investments are made by businessmen with the wrong signals. Lower than market interest rates will therefore mean a higher investment than the economy desires. This will mean that there will be capital goods that have been over invested, and will need to be liquidated. This liquidation is the cause of the depression that makes for the business cycle.

Lack of Accountability
There exists dispute about the accountability of this entire process. For example, one debunker goes through extensive arguments to show how well the system is audited and cites numerous instances of independent inspection by private accounting firms and the Government Accountability Office. This debunker's website then also lists the legal exemptions to outside audit. Exemptions to the Scope of GAO Audits The Government Accounting Office does not have complete access to all aspects of the Federal Reserve System. The (31 USCA §714) stipulates the following areas are to be excluded from GAO inspections: (2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, open market operations; The same author also can be quoted in one related article as saying In terms of monetary policy, the most important power is ... open market operations. Additionally, one Federal Reserve detractor cites a particular newspaper article as providing more evidence about a lack of accountability within the system. ...in The Wall St. Journal Dec.10 '93 pB5B western edition and p A7B eastern edition. The title is: "Fed's Audit System Needs Big 'Revisions,'Inspector General Says" I won't quote the entire text but I'll quote enough to prove my point.
"The Federal Reserve's system for auditing its 12 reserve banks is too cozy and needs 'major revisions'
The problem...is that the Fed's Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payments Systems is responsible both for the day-to-day oversight of reserve banks and for auditing them. This dual responsibility doesn't meet impartiality standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, according to the Fed's inspector general, Brent Bowen. 'We believe there is an appearance of a lack of independence,' his report says. It proposes that the Fed either fully segregate the audit program or hire an outside auditor." The report cited in this article is from the horse's mouth, the Fed's own inspector general Brent Bowen, and clearly states that the Federal Reserve audits itself. There is no question that there have been audits, and much evidence exists to support the claims that the Federal Reserve is independently audited in some fashion; however, with legal exemptions applying to the primary mechanism that is used to move tremendous amounts of money through the economy, it remains unclear how comprehensive these audits have been. Nonetheless, in the end, many experts agree that insulation of monetary policy from political wrangling is in the best interest of the citizens, even despite the fact that the door may be left open to corruption.

Fulfilment of Goals
Another criticism is that exercise of monetary policy in the United States has not achieved consistent success in meeting the goals that have been delegated to the Federal Reserve System by Congress. Goals of Monetary Policy Sustainable growth, High employment, Stable prices
# High employment - The depression of the late 1920's is generally regarded as being the worst in the country's history and it occurred a significant time after the institution of the system along with some cycles of recession, which have caused a negative impact on employment levels during those times.
# Stable prices - While some economists would regard any consistent inflation as a sign of unstable prices, policymakers could be satisfied with 1 or 2%. As such, long-term price stability has not yet been achieved in nearly 100 years of operation under the Federal Reserve System↑↑. Historic inflation has averaged a 3.4% increase annually since the establishment of the Federal Reserve, along with numerous yearly swings of 10% or more. In contrast, some research indicates that average inflation for the 250 years before the system was near zero percent, though there were likely sharper upward and downward spikes in that timeframe as compared with more recent times.
# Sustainable growth - The growth of the economy may not be sustainable as the ability for households to save money has been on an overall decline and household debt is consistently rising. Overall, Americans are losing the battle to inflation, as indicated by the decline of real wages.

↑↑ Price stability as analyzed using historical CPI measures.

Public Confusion
The Federal Reserve has established a library of information on their websites, however, many experts have spoken about the general level of public confusion that still exists on the subject of the economy. John Maynard Keynes even said of an inflationary economic system that it "engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose." Critics of the Fed widely regard the system as being "opaque." one of the most vehement opponents, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, even went so far as to say that "Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its powers..." There are, on the other hand, many economists who support the need for the Federal Reserve corporations, and some have established websites that aim to clear up confusion about the economy. The Federal Reserve website itself even has a Q&A feature that lets visitors pose questions to "Dr. Econ."

Prophet of Doom (sub-titled "Islam's Terrorist Dogma In Muhammad's Own Words") is a self-published book written by the American businessman-turned-author Craig Winn.

The book includes passages from the five principal Islamic sources: Ibn Ishaq’s Sira, Tabari’s Tarikh, Bukhari’s and Muslim’s Hadith.
Winn reordered the Qur’an chronologically and set it into the context of Muhammad’s life. The book contains quotes from Islamic scripture and examines various claims made in the Qur'an regarding the Biblical patriarchs, the Satanic Verses as well as topics such as the concept of Jihad and also the alleged Islamic promotion of pedophilia, incest, rape, piracy, the slave trade and terrorism. Winn also discusses the early history of Islam including Qusayy, an ancestor of Muhammad to whom the author credits many of the rituals and doctrine attributed to the prophet.

Prophet of Doom is out of print, but is available on its web site along with an audio version of the book. The web site for Prophet of Doom also includes other materials about Islam in its Resources section.

Response

The book has been received with hostility by Muslim lobby groups, claiming that Winn has misquoted the Quran out of context, has utilized errant mistranslations, and fabricated incriminating passages. The Council on American-Islamic Relations has accused Winn of "hatemongering and fomenting incitement for the purpose of cashing in on fear and ignorance."

Winn recognized the controversy "Prophet of Doom" may cause by prefacing the book with the following discliamer: "The critics of this work will claim that Prophet of Doom is offensive, racist, hatemongering, intolerant, and unnecessarily violent. I agree - but I didn't write those parts. They came directly from Islam's scriptures. If you don't like what Muhammad and Allah said, don't blame me. I'm just the messenger."
Jalal Abualrub has written a book titled Prophet of Mercy in response to Winn's book, and its first two chapters can be read online. In his book, Abualrub challenges Winn to a debate, to which Craig Winn responds in an article at the book's website.

Muslims Launched a website "" in response to Craig Winn, inviting readers to look into the subject from Islam's perspective.