SEARS-ROEBUCK DASHMATE AM/FM/CB RADIO
The Dashmate is an electronic radio that combines the AM band, FM band and CB band. The radio was created in the USA by Sears-Roebuck and Co. in 1965 and in Canada by Simpsons-Sears around the same year. Not much is known about the radio as there is little to no information on it. The radio itself carries markings of Model Number 564.626760 and FCC ID 28 62676. The radios information, wiring instructions and use is mounted on a 1/16-inch plate of aluminum and then rivited to the cover. Below the plate is a sticker that clearly states that it is a Dashmate.
The Dashmate is an electronic radio that combines the AM band, FM band and CB band. The radio was created in the USA by Sears-Roebuck and Co. in 1965 and in Canada by Simpsons-Sears around the same year. Not much is known about the radio as there is little to no information on it. The radio itself carries markings of Model Number 564.626760 and FCC ID 28 62676. The radios information, wiring instructions and use is mounted on a 1/16-inch plate of aluminum and then rivited to the cover. Below the plate is a sticker that clearly states that it is a Dashmate.
Definition
Monkey Patching.
History
Duck Raping is a phrase coined by Ryan Davis at RubyConf2007. The term is used by Ryan to describe the abusive use of Monkey Patching.
This is in contrast to Monkey Patching, which is used when the programmer is adding features or fixing minor bugs in the implementation.
Ryan Davis used the term in his presentation on 'Hurting Code for Fun and Profit'. This talk was also where the term 'Mentarbation' was made public.
Monkey Patching.
History
Duck Raping is a phrase coined by Ryan Davis at RubyConf2007. The term is used by Ryan to describe the abusive use of Monkey Patching.
This is in contrast to Monkey Patching, which is used when the programmer is adding features or fixing minor bugs in the implementation.
Ryan Davis used the term in his presentation on 'Hurting Code for Fun and Profit'. This talk was also where the term 'Mentarbation' was made public.
Sanchin ryu is a martial art originating from Leslie, Michigan in the early 1970's. Founded and directed by Robert H. Dearman. It is founded on the basic principal of self defense and is a family oriented martial art. Sanchin Ryu is non-profit and is therefore usually run through local school systems. Although Sanchin Ryu classes are held in many parts of the world, there are comparatively few outside of Michigan.
----
Origins
Developed more than 30 years ago. Sanchin-Ryu is an artistic form of self-defense designed in a way so, that size or strength, age or athletic ability are not factors in defending one’s self. Taught on an individual basis, students study in a non-competitive environment while working on Sanchin-Ryu’s practical movements and no-nonsense approach to self-defense. -- OSKA Website
----
Progression Advancement in Sanchin Ryu is done through personal progress and not through defined testing. The progression of belt ranks are as follows: White, Orange, Green, Purple, 3rd Brown, 2nd Brown, 1st Brown, Sho Dan or first degree black belt.
----
Origins
Developed more than 30 years ago. Sanchin-Ryu is an artistic form of self-defense designed in a way so, that size or strength, age or athletic ability are not factors in defending one’s self. Taught on an individual basis, students study in a non-competitive environment while working on Sanchin-Ryu’s practical movements and no-nonsense approach to self-defense. -- OSKA Website
----
Progression Advancement in Sanchin Ryu is done through personal progress and not through defined testing. The progression of belt ranks are as follows: White, Orange, Green, Purple, 3rd Brown, 2nd Brown, 1st Brown, Sho Dan or first degree black belt.
Flow-driven programming is a computer programming paradigm used by traditional programs, which follow their own control flow pattern, only sometimes changing course at branch points (in this, it is markedly similar to procedural programming). Many common programs will fall under this paradigm, for example, wget would seem to fall under it, as the flow of the program is not based on outside events, but rather on the operations as structured in the program being performed. This is in contrast to Event-driven programming, which is especially common in applications which are asynchronous, such as a text editor, a kernel, or a GUI application.
The direct opposite to flow-driven programming is event-driven programming; in this paradigm, the program is not in control of when it receives input - it merely processes the data received through a callback or similar and takes the needed course of action. Due to the prerequisite state constraints, event-driven programming tends to be favoured by purely functional languages, whereas flow-driven programming is embodied better in imperative programming languages. However, monads have proven powerful enough to use an imperative style in a purely functional language with a small amount of purely syntactic sugar (ie, no semantic, only providing a nicer way of writing what could be written before), allowing a more flow-driven approach. In fact, it is possible to view monadic binding itself as a flow mechanism, so that monadic programming and flow-driven programming coincide is no great surprise.
The direct opposite to flow-driven programming is event-driven programming; in this paradigm, the program is not in control of when it receives input - it merely processes the data received through a callback or similar and takes the needed course of action. Due to the prerequisite state constraints, event-driven programming tends to be favoured by purely functional languages, whereas flow-driven programming is embodied better in imperative programming languages. However, monads have proven powerful enough to use an imperative style in a purely functional language with a small amount of purely syntactic sugar (ie, no semantic, only providing a nicer way of writing what could be written before), allowing a more flow-driven approach. In fact, it is possible to view monadic binding itself as a flow mechanism, so that monadic programming and flow-driven programming coincide is no great surprise.