Project Followership is
a recent Project Management discipline that looks at projects with a bottom up approach. While in fact the vast majority of Project Management publications are targeted to Project Managers, Project Followership considers team members as the key actors. Project Followership is not antagonist to Project Management but it is complimentary.
Origin
The first time that the term Project Followership has been used in a public and written format can be dated back to 1992. To be noted that authors reported followership in brackets.
In the academic environment the term project followership can be first found at the Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, as a topic listed in the course catalog for the academic year 2009-2010.
Another reference can be found at the Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, where professor Smulders lists Project Followership as a topic presented during lectures and as a coaching activity.
The first public written contribution completely dedicated to the project followership subject can be considered the italian book Partecipare a un progetto (Participating in a project), ETAS 2010 .
Motivation
Project management is a relatively young discipline (barely 70 years old) which is constantly evolving and has a growing popularity. As a consequence, a large number of publications on the subject are available.
The state of the art of the subject can be summarized as follow: strong presence of publications on the general aspects of project management; good presence of articles on particular methodological or organizational aspects, such as project leadership; verticalization on sectors such information systems or construction; few books and articles about neighboring disciplines such as project portfolio management, program management, or multi-project management.
Almost all the publications are centered around the project manager. The team is always seen from a top-down point of view: the project manager must select the team, he/she must coordinate it, motivate it, deal with internal conflicts, etc.
If one looks at the discipline of project management from collaborators’ perspective, not from the coordinators one, nothing suitable can be found. In fact, nobody has so far dealt with project management taking into account the knowledge, skills, and behaviors that a collaborator must have to participate in a project as team member. Hence the idea of looking at project management bottom-up, in order to supply collaborators with useful knowledge in order to perform their tasks well.
By citing one of the author of the first Project Followership publication : “Too often projects are passively accepted rather than actively participated in.
The issue is not that the birth of the project is not shared, but mostly that many people feel lost, since they don’t have the right knowledge to understand the dynamics of the project. So project meetings are often turned into failed affairs where irrelevant questions are posed (and this decreases participation and increases conflicts), the kick-off meeting is considered a waste of time where you can get free sandwiches, and planning meetings become technical summits where everybody speaks in impenetrable jargon, creating mutual dissatisfaction.”
Reinterpreting the project according to a bottom-up logic seeks to address these problems by equipping each participant with right tools.
Development
Beside the incidental use of the term Project Followership, major developements can be seen starting from 2010. In fact, in 2010 the first dedicated publication appeared, some training provider added project followership in its offer , and in February 2011 the topic has been presented at the NASA Project Management Challenge.
a recent Project Management discipline that looks at projects with a bottom up approach. While in fact the vast majority of Project Management publications are targeted to Project Managers, Project Followership considers team members as the key actors. Project Followership is not antagonist to Project Management but it is complimentary.
Origin
The first time that the term Project Followership has been used in a public and written format can be dated back to 1992. To be noted that authors reported followership in brackets.
In the academic environment the term project followership can be first found at the Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, as a topic listed in the course catalog for the academic year 2009-2010.
Another reference can be found at the Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, where professor Smulders lists Project Followership as a topic presented during lectures and as a coaching activity.
The first public written contribution completely dedicated to the project followership subject can be considered the italian book Partecipare a un progetto (Participating in a project), ETAS 2010 .
Motivation
Project management is a relatively young discipline (barely 70 years old) which is constantly evolving and has a growing popularity. As a consequence, a large number of publications on the subject are available.
The state of the art of the subject can be summarized as follow: strong presence of publications on the general aspects of project management; good presence of articles on particular methodological or organizational aspects, such as project leadership; verticalization on sectors such information systems or construction; few books and articles about neighboring disciplines such as project portfolio management, program management, or multi-project management.
Almost all the publications are centered around the project manager. The team is always seen from a top-down point of view: the project manager must select the team, he/she must coordinate it, motivate it, deal with internal conflicts, etc.
If one looks at the discipline of project management from collaborators’ perspective, not from the coordinators one, nothing suitable can be found. In fact, nobody has so far dealt with project management taking into account the knowledge, skills, and behaviors that a collaborator must have to participate in a project as team member. Hence the idea of looking at project management bottom-up, in order to supply collaborators with useful knowledge in order to perform their tasks well.
By citing one of the author of the first Project Followership publication : “Too often projects are passively accepted rather than actively participated in.
The issue is not that the birth of the project is not shared, but mostly that many people feel lost, since they don’t have the right knowledge to understand the dynamics of the project. So project meetings are often turned into failed affairs where irrelevant questions are posed (and this decreases participation and increases conflicts), the kick-off meeting is considered a waste of time where you can get free sandwiches, and planning meetings become technical summits where everybody speaks in impenetrable jargon, creating mutual dissatisfaction.”
Reinterpreting the project according to a bottom-up logic seeks to address these problems by equipping each participant with right tools.
Development
Beside the incidental use of the term Project Followership, major developements can be seen starting from 2010. In fact, in 2010 the first dedicated publication appeared, some training provider added project followership in its offer , and in February 2011 the topic has been presented at the NASA Project Management Challenge.
DGen is a Sega Genesis (Mega Drive) emulator. It runs on many operating systems including Microsoft Windows and Linux. It is open source software licensed under the BSD License.
DGen/SDL is the version that uses Simple DirectMedia Layer.
The version maintained by Syn-Z for PlayStation Portable 1.7 is a fork of DGen/SDL 1.23.
Features
* Save states
* Full-screen mode
* Interlace mode
* Game Genie support
* Joystick support
* Compressed ROM images
* Run in 64-bit (since 1.25)
Trivia
* An enhanced version of DGen was best known emulating the Sonic games for Sonic Mega Collection on the GameCube, Playstation 2, and Xbox consoles. Gens/GS was used for Sonic Mega Collection Plus for the PC.
DGen/SDL is the version that uses Simple DirectMedia Layer.
The version maintained by Syn-Z for PlayStation Portable 1.7 is a fork of DGen/SDL 1.23.
Features
* Save states
* Full-screen mode
* Interlace mode
* Game Genie support
* Joystick support
* Compressed ROM images
* Run in 64-bit (since 1.25)
Trivia
* An enhanced version of DGen was best known emulating the Sonic games for Sonic Mega Collection on the GameCube, Playstation 2, and Xbox consoles. Gens/GS was used for Sonic Mega Collection Plus for the PC.
Sid Mohammed Tarrabain (November 1958-August 2011) was a prominent Edmonton lawyer and a successful businessman.
Background
Sid was born in Lac La Biche, Alberta on November 17, 1958 to Mohammed "Jim" and Inaam Tarrabain. Sid was the only son of a family of ten.
Sid Tarrabain obtained his undergraduate degree in Bachelor of Science at the University of Alberta, specializing in Psychology and Statistics. In 1985 he achieved a Bachelor of Laws LLb (Hons) from the University Of Cardiff in Wales. During his time in Wales, he travelled extensively throughout Europe. Upon returning back to Edmonton in 1986 he joined the Law Society of Alberta and began practicing law in Edmonton.
Sid went on to open his own law firm Tarrabain & Company in 1990, specializing in criminal and personal injury law.
Achievements
Sid Tarrabain appeared before both national and international tribunals, winning many precedent setting cases. He argued before the Supreme Court Of Canada. He was also a member of the Law Society of the North West Territories.
Sid Tarrabain was so esteemed, he was honored with Queen's Counsel in 2002. His passion was the law never leaving an issue unturned.
In the Cardiff Alumni Profile, Sid was questioned about his greatest achievement as being: "Opening up my own practice in 1990 and being appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2002. I have argued before the most respected judges in Canada, having represented clients at the Supreme Court of Canada and being a part of precedent-setting cases. In addition, being appointed Queen’s Counsel allows me to mentor law students and other counsel in the expertise of criminal law. Generally, I am most proud that I have a successful and rewarding career."
Background
Sid was born in Lac La Biche, Alberta on November 17, 1958 to Mohammed "Jim" and Inaam Tarrabain. Sid was the only son of a family of ten.
Sid Tarrabain obtained his undergraduate degree in Bachelor of Science at the University of Alberta, specializing in Psychology and Statistics. In 1985 he achieved a Bachelor of Laws LLb (Hons) from the University Of Cardiff in Wales. During his time in Wales, he travelled extensively throughout Europe. Upon returning back to Edmonton in 1986 he joined the Law Society of Alberta and began practicing law in Edmonton.
Sid went on to open his own law firm Tarrabain & Company in 1990, specializing in criminal and personal injury law.
Achievements
Sid Tarrabain appeared before both national and international tribunals, winning many precedent setting cases. He argued before the Supreme Court Of Canada. He was also a member of the Law Society of the North West Territories.
Sid Tarrabain was so esteemed, he was honored with Queen's Counsel in 2002. His passion was the law never leaving an issue unturned.
In the Cardiff Alumni Profile, Sid was questioned about his greatest achievement as being: "Opening up my own practice in 1990 and being appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2002. I have argued before the most respected judges in Canada, having represented clients at the Supreme Court of Canada and being a part of precedent-setting cases. In addition, being appointed Queen’s Counsel allows me to mentor law students and other counsel in the expertise of criminal law. Generally, I am most proud that I have a successful and rewarding career."
K-1 Fighting Network KHAN 2007 in Seoul was a kickboxing event promoted by the K-1 Khan in association with K-1. The event was held at the Olympic Gymnasium-1, in Seoul, South Korea, on Sunday, February 18th, 2007. It was an eight-man elimination tournament for fighters based in South Korea and the East Asia region, with all matches fought under K-1 MAX Rules (70 kg/153 lbs weight class). The winner advanced to the K-1 World MAX 2007 World Tournament Final Elimination. As well as tournament matches there were also four ‘Super Fights’ fought under K-1 MAX Rules, and a ‘Special Fight’ fought under K-1 Rules (100kg/156-220lbs). In total there were eighteen fighters, representing five countries. The tournament champion was Su Hwan Lee who beat Chi Bin Lim in the final by first round knockout.
K-1 Fighting Network KHAN 2007 Tournament
* Yeon Jong Kim replaced Sinbi Taewoong in the Semi Finals as Sinbi Taewoong was injured
Results
*Reserve Fight: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:K.MAX vs Driton Rama
:K.MAX defeated Rama by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (30-28, 30-28, 30-29).
*Quarter Finals: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:Sung Hoon Kim vs Su Hwan Lee
:Lee defeated Kim by KO at 0:30 of the 1st Round.
:Pan Su Kim vs Jin Hwan Lee
:Lee defeated Kim by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (29-28, 30-28, 30-28).
:Chi Bin Lim vs Naoki Samukawa
:Lim defeated Samukawa by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0
:Yeon Jong Kim vs Sinbi Taewoong
:Taewoong defeated Kim by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (30-29, 30-28, 30-28) but had to withdraw due to injury - Kim would replace him in the Semi Finals.
*Super Fights: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.2R
:Jae-Sik Choi vs Dong Jiang Tao
:Choi defeated Tao won by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (30-27, 30-27, 30-27).
:Han Wul Kim vs Sirimongkol Singwangcha
:Singwangcha defeated Kim by KO at 0:20 of the 3rd Round.
*Semi Finals: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:Su Hwan Lee vs Jin Hwan Lee
:Su Hwan Lee defeated Jin Hwan Lee by 3rd Round Majority Decision 2-0 (29-29, 30-28, 30-29).
:Chi Bin Lim vs Yeon Jong Kim
:Lim defeated Taewoong by KO at 1:40 of the 3rd Round.
*Super Fight: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.2R
:Yong-Soo Choi vs Yoshiharu Nasu
:Choi defeated Nasu by 3rd Round Majority Decision 2-0 (30-29, 30-29, 30-30).
*Special Fight (Heavyweight): K-1 Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.2R
:Kaoklai Kaennorsing vs Yong-Soo Park
:Kaennorsing defeated Park by Extra Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (10-9, 10-9, 10-9). After 3 rounds the judges had scored it a Decision Draw 0-0 (30-30, 30-30, 29-29).
*Final: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:Su Hwan Lee vs Chi Bin Lim
:Lee defeated Lim by KO at 1:50 of the 1st Round.
K-1 Fighting Network KHAN 2007 Tournament
* Yeon Jong Kim replaced Sinbi Taewoong in the Semi Finals as Sinbi Taewoong was injured
Results
*Reserve Fight: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:K.MAX vs Driton Rama
:K.MAX defeated Rama by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (30-28, 30-28, 30-29).
*Quarter Finals: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:Sung Hoon Kim vs Su Hwan Lee
:Lee defeated Kim by KO at 0:30 of the 1st Round.
:Pan Su Kim vs Jin Hwan Lee
:Lee defeated Kim by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (29-28, 30-28, 30-28).
:Chi Bin Lim vs Naoki Samukawa
:Lim defeated Samukawa by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0
:Yeon Jong Kim vs Sinbi Taewoong
:Taewoong defeated Kim by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (30-29, 30-28, 30-28) but had to withdraw due to injury - Kim would replace him in the Semi Finals.
*Super Fights: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.2R
:Jae-Sik Choi vs Dong Jiang Tao
:Choi defeated Tao won by 3rd Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (30-27, 30-27, 30-27).
:Han Wul Kim vs Sirimongkol Singwangcha
:Singwangcha defeated Kim by KO at 0:20 of the 3rd Round.
*Semi Finals: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:Su Hwan Lee vs Jin Hwan Lee
:Su Hwan Lee defeated Jin Hwan Lee by 3rd Round Majority Decision 2-0 (29-29, 30-28, 30-29).
:Chi Bin Lim vs Yeon Jong Kim
:Lim defeated Taewoong by KO at 1:40 of the 3rd Round.
*Super Fight: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.2R
:Yong-Soo Choi vs Yoshiharu Nasu
:Choi defeated Nasu by 3rd Round Majority Decision 2-0 (30-29, 30-29, 30-30).
*Special Fight (Heavyweight): K-1 Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.2R
:Kaoklai Kaennorsing vs Yong-Soo Park
:Kaennorsing defeated Park by Extra Round Unanimous Decision 3-0 (10-9, 10-9, 10-9). After 3 rounds the judges had scored it a Decision Draw 0-0 (30-30, 30-30, 29-29).
*Final: K-1 MAX Rules / 3Min. 3R Ext.1R
:Su Hwan Lee vs Chi Bin Lim
:Lee defeated Lim by KO at 1:50 of the 1st Round.