Scope of government refers to the responsibilities and functions of government. The proper scope of government, the question on where the line should be drawn between the public and private sectors, has been the subject of much debate. Liberals generally believe that the proper scope of government should be relatively broad while conservatives and libertarians believe that the proper scope of government should be relatively narrow.
Passages
:I want to talk to you about what government can do because I believe government must do more. - Bill Clinton
:It is, of course, not desirable that anything should be done by funds derived from compulsory taxation, which is already sufficiently well done by individual liberality. - John Stuart Mill
:When law and force confine a man within the bounds of justice, they do not impose anything on him but a mere negation. They impose on him only the obligation to refrain from injuring others. They do not infringe on his personality, or his liberty or his property. They merely safeguard the personality, the liberty, and the property of others. They stand on the defensive; they defend the equal rights of all. They fulfill a mission whose harmlessness is evident, whose utility is palpable, and whose legitimacy is uncontested. - Frédéric Bastiat
:To the assertion that the boundary line of State-duty as above drawn is at the wrong place, the obvious rejoinder is— show us where it should be drawn. This appeal the expediency-philosophers have never yet been able to answer. Their alleged definitions are no definitions at all. As was proved at the outset, to say that government ought to do that which is "expedient," or to do that which will tend to produce the "greatest happiness," or to do that which will subserve the "general good," is to say just nothing; for there are countless disagreements respecting the natures of these desiderata. A definition of which the terms are indefinite is an absurdity. Whilst the practical interpretation of "expediency" remains a. matter of opinion, to say that a government should do that which is "expedient," is to say that it should do, what we think it should do!
:Still then our demand is—a definition. Between the two extremes of its possible action, where lies the proper limitation? Shall it extend its interference to the fixing of creeds, as in the old times; or to overlooking modes of manufacture, farming operations, and domestic affairs, as it once did; or to commerce, as of late—to popular education, as now—to public health, as already—to dress, as in China—to literature, as in Austria—to charity, to manners, to amusements? If not to all of them, to which of them? Should the perplexed inquirer seek refuge in authority, he will find precedents not only for these but for many more such interferences. If, like those who disapprove of master-tailors having their work done off the premises, or like those who want to prevent the produce of industrial prisons displacing that of the artizans, or like those who would restrain charity-school children from competing with seamstresses, he thinks it desirable to meddle with trade-arrangements, there are plenty of exemplars for him. There is the law of Henry VII., which directed people at what fairs they should sell their goods; and that of Edward VI., which enacted a fine of £100 for a usurious bargain; and that of James I., which prescribed the quantity of ale to be sold for a penny; and that of Henry VIII., which made it penal to sell any pins but such as are "double headed, and their head soldered fast to the shank, and well smoothed; the shank well shaven; the point well and round-filed and sharpened." He has the countenance, too, of those enactments which fixed the wages of labour; and of those which dictated to farmers, as in 1533, when the sowing of hemp and flax was made compulsory; and of those which forbade the use of certain materials, as that now largely-consumed article, logwood, was forbidden in 1597. If he approves of so extended a superintendence, perhaps he would adopt M. Louis Blanc's idea that "government should be considered as the supreme regulator of production;" and having adopted it, push State-control as far as it was once carried in France, when manufacturers were pilloried for defects in the materials they employed, and in the textures of their fabrics; when some were fined for weaving of worsted a kind of cloth which the law said should be made of mohair, and others because their camlets were not of the specified width; and when a man was not at liberty to choose the place for his establishment, nor to work at all seasons, nor to work for everybody. Is this considered too detailed an interference? Then, perhaps, greater favour will be shown to those German regulations by which a shoemaker is prevented from following his craft until an inspecting jury has certified his competence; which disable a man who has chosen one calling from ever adopting another; and which forbid any foreign tradesman from settling in a German town without a licence. And if work is to be regulated, is it not proper that work should be provided, and the idle compelled to perform a due amount of it? In which case how shall we deal with our vagrant population? Shall we take a hint from Fletcher of Saltoun, who warmly advocated the establishment of slavery in Scotland as a boon to "so many thousands of our people who are at this day dying for want of bread"? or shall we adopt the analogous suggestion of Mr. Carlyle, who would remedy the distresses of Ireland by organizing its people into drilled regiments of diggers? The hours of labour too—what must be done about these? Having acceded to the petition of the factory-workers, ought we not to entertain that of the journeyman-bakers? and if that of the journeyman bakers, why not, as Mr. Oobden asks, consider the cases of the glass-blowers, the nightmen, the iron-founders, the Sheffield knife-grinders, and indeed all other classes, including the hardworked M.P.'s themselves? And when employment has been provided, and the hours of labour fixed, and trade-regulations settled, we must decide how far the State ought to look after people's minds, and morals, and health. There is this education question: having satisfied the prevalent wish for "government schools with tax-paid teachers, and adopted Mr. Ewart's plan for town-libraries and museums, should we not canvass the supplementary proposal to have national lecturers? and if this proposal is assented to, would it not be well to carry out the scheme of Sir David Brewster, who desired to have "men ordained by the State to the undivided functions of science"—"an intellectual priesthood," " to develop the glorious truths which time and space embosom*"? Then having established "an intellectual priesthood" to keep company with our religious one, a priesthood of physic, such as is advocated by certain feeless medical men, and of which we have already the germ in our union doctors, would nicely complete the trio. And when it had been agreed to put the sick under the care of public officials, consistency would of course demand the adoption of Mr. G. A. Walker's system of government funerals, under which "those in authority" are "to take especial care" that "the poorest of our brethren" shall have "an appropriate and solemn transmission" to the grave, and are to grant in certain cases "gratuitous means of interment." Having carried out thus far the communist plan of doing everything for everybody, should we not consider the peoples' amusements, and, taking example from the opera-subsidy in France, establish public ball-rooms, and gratis concerts, and cheap theatres, with State-paid actors, musicians, and masters of the ceremonies: using care at the same time duly to regulate the popular taste, as indeed, in the case of the Art-Union subscribers, our present Government proposed to do? Speaking of taste naturally reminds us of dress, in which sundry improvements might be enforced; for instance—the abolition of hats: we should have good precedents either in Edward IV., who find those wearing "any gown or mantell" not according to specification, and who limited the superfluity of peoples' boot-toes, or in Charles II., who prescribed the material for his subjects' grave-clothes. The matter of health, too, would need attending to; and, in dealing with this, might we not profitably reconsider those ancient statutes which protected peoples' stomachs by restricting the expenses of their tables; or, remembering how injurious are our fashionable late hours, might we not advantageously take a hint from the old Norman practice, and (otherwise prompted) fix the time at which people should put out their fires and go to bed; or might we not with benefit act upon the opinion of M. Beausobre, a statesman who said it was "proper to watch during the fruit season, lest the people eat that which is not ripe"? And then, by way of making the superintendence complete, would it not be well to follow the example of the Danish king who gave directions to his subjects how they should scour their floors, and polish their furniture? - Herbert Spencer
:Conservatives over the last few years have increasingly claimed that America is, in Hayek’s terms, on the road to serfdom. This is ridiculous, for it ascribes vastly greater coherence to American government than we have ever achieved. If anything, we have arrived at a form of government with no ideological justification whatsoever. - Steven Teles, Kludgeocracy
Passages
:I want to talk to you about what government can do because I believe government must do more. - Bill Clinton
:It is, of course, not desirable that anything should be done by funds derived from compulsory taxation, which is already sufficiently well done by individual liberality. - John Stuart Mill
:When law and force confine a man within the bounds of justice, they do not impose anything on him but a mere negation. They impose on him only the obligation to refrain from injuring others. They do not infringe on his personality, or his liberty or his property. They merely safeguard the personality, the liberty, and the property of others. They stand on the defensive; they defend the equal rights of all. They fulfill a mission whose harmlessness is evident, whose utility is palpable, and whose legitimacy is uncontested. - Frédéric Bastiat
:To the assertion that the boundary line of State-duty as above drawn is at the wrong place, the obvious rejoinder is— show us where it should be drawn. This appeal the expediency-philosophers have never yet been able to answer. Their alleged definitions are no definitions at all. As was proved at the outset, to say that government ought to do that which is "expedient," or to do that which will tend to produce the "greatest happiness," or to do that which will subserve the "general good," is to say just nothing; for there are countless disagreements respecting the natures of these desiderata. A definition of which the terms are indefinite is an absurdity. Whilst the practical interpretation of "expediency" remains a. matter of opinion, to say that a government should do that which is "expedient," is to say that it should do, what we think it should do!
:Still then our demand is—a definition. Between the two extremes of its possible action, where lies the proper limitation? Shall it extend its interference to the fixing of creeds, as in the old times; or to overlooking modes of manufacture, farming operations, and domestic affairs, as it once did; or to commerce, as of late—to popular education, as now—to public health, as already—to dress, as in China—to literature, as in Austria—to charity, to manners, to amusements? If not to all of them, to which of them? Should the perplexed inquirer seek refuge in authority, he will find precedents not only for these but for many more such interferences. If, like those who disapprove of master-tailors having their work done off the premises, or like those who want to prevent the produce of industrial prisons displacing that of the artizans, or like those who would restrain charity-school children from competing with seamstresses, he thinks it desirable to meddle with trade-arrangements, there are plenty of exemplars for him. There is the law of Henry VII., which directed people at what fairs they should sell their goods; and that of Edward VI., which enacted a fine of £100 for a usurious bargain; and that of James I., which prescribed the quantity of ale to be sold for a penny; and that of Henry VIII., which made it penal to sell any pins but such as are "double headed, and their head soldered fast to the shank, and well smoothed; the shank well shaven; the point well and round-filed and sharpened." He has the countenance, too, of those enactments which fixed the wages of labour; and of those which dictated to farmers, as in 1533, when the sowing of hemp and flax was made compulsory; and of those which forbade the use of certain materials, as that now largely-consumed article, logwood, was forbidden in 1597. If he approves of so extended a superintendence, perhaps he would adopt M. Louis Blanc's idea that "government should be considered as the supreme regulator of production;" and having adopted it, push State-control as far as it was once carried in France, when manufacturers were pilloried for defects in the materials they employed, and in the textures of their fabrics; when some were fined for weaving of worsted a kind of cloth which the law said should be made of mohair, and others because their camlets were not of the specified width; and when a man was not at liberty to choose the place for his establishment, nor to work at all seasons, nor to work for everybody. Is this considered too detailed an interference? Then, perhaps, greater favour will be shown to those German regulations by which a shoemaker is prevented from following his craft until an inspecting jury has certified his competence; which disable a man who has chosen one calling from ever adopting another; and which forbid any foreign tradesman from settling in a German town without a licence. And if work is to be regulated, is it not proper that work should be provided, and the idle compelled to perform a due amount of it? In which case how shall we deal with our vagrant population? Shall we take a hint from Fletcher of Saltoun, who warmly advocated the establishment of slavery in Scotland as a boon to "so many thousands of our people who are at this day dying for want of bread"? or shall we adopt the analogous suggestion of Mr. Carlyle, who would remedy the distresses of Ireland by organizing its people into drilled regiments of diggers? The hours of labour too—what must be done about these? Having acceded to the petition of the factory-workers, ought we not to entertain that of the journeyman-bakers? and if that of the journeyman bakers, why not, as Mr. Oobden asks, consider the cases of the glass-blowers, the nightmen, the iron-founders, the Sheffield knife-grinders, and indeed all other classes, including the hardworked M.P.'s themselves? And when employment has been provided, and the hours of labour fixed, and trade-regulations settled, we must decide how far the State ought to look after people's minds, and morals, and health. There is this education question: having satisfied the prevalent wish for "government schools with tax-paid teachers, and adopted Mr. Ewart's plan for town-libraries and museums, should we not canvass the supplementary proposal to have national lecturers? and if this proposal is assented to, would it not be well to carry out the scheme of Sir David Brewster, who desired to have "men ordained by the State to the undivided functions of science"—"an intellectual priesthood," " to develop the glorious truths which time and space embosom*"? Then having established "an intellectual priesthood" to keep company with our religious one, a priesthood of physic, such as is advocated by certain feeless medical men, and of which we have already the germ in our union doctors, would nicely complete the trio. And when it had been agreed to put the sick under the care of public officials, consistency would of course demand the adoption of Mr. G. A. Walker's system of government funerals, under which "those in authority" are "to take especial care" that "the poorest of our brethren" shall have "an appropriate and solemn transmission" to the grave, and are to grant in certain cases "gratuitous means of interment." Having carried out thus far the communist plan of doing everything for everybody, should we not consider the peoples' amusements, and, taking example from the opera-subsidy in France, establish public ball-rooms, and gratis concerts, and cheap theatres, with State-paid actors, musicians, and masters of the ceremonies: using care at the same time duly to regulate the popular taste, as indeed, in the case of the Art-Union subscribers, our present Government proposed to do? Speaking of taste naturally reminds us of dress, in which sundry improvements might be enforced; for instance—the abolition of hats: we should have good precedents either in Edward IV., who find those wearing "any gown or mantell" not according to specification, and who limited the superfluity of peoples' boot-toes, or in Charles II., who prescribed the material for his subjects' grave-clothes. The matter of health, too, would need attending to; and, in dealing with this, might we not profitably reconsider those ancient statutes which protected peoples' stomachs by restricting the expenses of their tables; or, remembering how injurious are our fashionable late hours, might we not advantageously take a hint from the old Norman practice, and (otherwise prompted) fix the time at which people should put out their fires and go to bed; or might we not with benefit act upon the opinion of M. Beausobre, a statesman who said it was "proper to watch during the fruit season, lest the people eat that which is not ripe"? And then, by way of making the superintendence complete, would it not be well to follow the example of the Danish king who gave directions to his subjects how they should scour their floors, and polish their furniture? - Herbert Spencer
:Conservatives over the last few years have increasingly claimed that America is, in Hayek’s terms, on the road to serfdom. This is ridiculous, for it ascribes vastly greater coherence to American government than we have ever achieved. If anything, we have arrived at a form of government with no ideological justification whatsoever. - Steven Teles, Kludgeocracy
“Suburban Fluxus” is a contemporary art movement created by the visual art team of in their contemporary art practice. The use of term to describe the movement was first coined in 2011 to describe their single channel video art work titled “DIY Love Seat” which was created during an Artist-in-Resident program at the Lawndale Art Center in Houston, Texas.
The term “Suburban Fluxus” references the historic art movement of Fluxus in the 1960s that incorporated humor, performance, video and everyday objects. Artists in the original movement included Nam June Paik, Yoko Ono and Ben Patterson.
Hillerbrand+Magsamen expanded on this original definition of Fluxus to create their own way to describe their expanding art practice that used their own personal family life to open a conversation about family dynamics, suburban life and American consumer excess.
This new kind of “suburban fluxus” generates work that documents and re-contextualizes their objects and possessions of self, family and culture, the role of the camera in contemporary art and challenging presumptions of the everyday. This might include toys, gardening supplies, a couch, stuffed animals, their car and pets among other things that are incorporated into videos, performances, sculptures and installations.
Hillerbrand+Magsamen have continued to use this term in describing more recent works such as Elevated Landscape (2011), Whole (2012), Longing and Belonging (2012).
The term “Suburban Fluxus” references the historic art movement of Fluxus in the 1960s that incorporated humor, performance, video and everyday objects. Artists in the original movement included Nam June Paik, Yoko Ono and Ben Patterson.
Hillerbrand+Magsamen expanded on this original definition of Fluxus to create their own way to describe their expanding art practice that used their own personal family life to open a conversation about family dynamics, suburban life and American consumer excess.
This new kind of “suburban fluxus” generates work that documents and re-contextualizes their objects and possessions of self, family and culture, the role of the camera in contemporary art and challenging presumptions of the everyday. This might include toys, gardening supplies, a couch, stuffed animals, their car and pets among other things that are incorporated into videos, performances, sculptures and installations.
Hillerbrand+Magsamen have continued to use this term in describing more recent works such as Elevated Landscape (2011), Whole (2012), Longing and Belonging (2012).
This is a list of self-identified social democrats or those historically considered social democrats.
<div style="-moz-column-count:3; column-count:3;">
* Victor Adler
* Martti Ahtisaari
* Raúl Alfonsín
* Oscar Arias Sanchez
* Clement Attlee
* Pavel Axelrod
* Michelle Bachelet
* Ehud Barak
* José Batlle y Ordoñez
* Harry Schwarz
* Otto Bauer
* Daniel Bell
* David Ben-Gurion
* Eduard Bernstein
* Rubén Berríos
* Hermes Binner
* Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister (1997-2007)
* Léon Blum
* Rodrigo Borja Cevallos
* Willy Brandt
* Hjalmar Branting
* Leonel Brizola
* Ed Broadbent
* Gro Harlem Brundtland
* Gordon Brown, former British Prime Minister (2007-2010)
* Vince Cable
* Fernando Henrique Cardoso
* Ingvar Carlsson
* Helen Clark
* Major James Coldwell
* Gilberto Concepción de Gracia
* Job Cohen
* Brendan Corish
* Mário Covas
* Juan Dalmau Ramírez
* Fedor Dan
* Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
*
*
* Elio Di Rupo
* Milorad Dodik, Prime Minister of Republic of Srpska
* Tommy Douglas
* Ruth Dreifuss
* Bülent Ecevit
* Tage Erlander
* Mauricio Funes, Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front candidate for the Salvadoran presidential election, 2009
* Carlos Garaikoetxea
* Einar Gerhardsen
* Anthony Giddens
* Eamon Gilmore
* Felipe Gonzalez
* Mikhail Gorbachev
* Zita Gurmai
* Per Albin Hansson
* Sheikh Hasina
* Bob Hawke
* L. T. Hobhouse
* J. A. Hobson
* Toomas Hendrik Ilves
* John Hume
* Ion Iliescu
* Erdal Inonu
* Jean Jaurès
* Roy Jenkins
* Lionel Jospin
* Paul Keating
* Friedrich Kellner
* Norman Kirk
* Wim Kok
* Bruno Kreisky
* Etbin Kristan
* Dennis Kucinich
* Robert Kuttner
*
* Oskar Lafontaine
* Ricardo Lagos
* Ferdinand Lassalle
* Mark Latham
* James Laxer
* Jack Layton
* Julius Leber
* René Lévesque
* David Lewis
* Anna Lindh
* Paavo Lipponen
* Ramsay Macdonald
* Nelson Mandela
* Julius Martov
* Golda Meir
* Dom Mintoff
* Ralph Nader
* Andreas Papandreou
* José Francisco Peña Gómez
* Göran Persson
* Louis Pio
* Georgi Plekhanov
* Karl Polanyi
* Victor Ponta, Prime Minister of Romania
*
*
* Poul Nyrup Rasmussen
* J. J. Rawlings
* August Rei
* Bill Rodgers
* Ségolène Royal
* Manuel Rosales
* Mona Sahlin
* Alex Salmond
* Bernie Sanders
* Giuseppe Saragat
* Michael Joseph Savage
* Wim Schermerhorn
* Gerhard Schröder
* Hans Schultz
* Max Shachtman
* Lim Kit Siang
* Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir
* Karpal Singh
* Dick Spring
* Thorvald Stauning
* Jens Stoltenberg
* Dominique Strauss-Kahn
* Norman Thomas
* Pierre Trudeau
* Gough Whitlam
* Shirley Williams
* Joop den Uyl
* J. S. Woodsworth
* José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero
* Vera Zasulich
* Frank Zeidler, mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (largest U.S. city to have a Socialist mayor)
</div>
<div style="-moz-column-count:3; column-count:3;">
* Victor Adler
* Martti Ahtisaari
* Raúl Alfonsín
* Oscar Arias Sanchez
* Clement Attlee
* Pavel Axelrod
* Michelle Bachelet
* Ehud Barak
* José Batlle y Ordoñez
* Harry Schwarz
* Otto Bauer
* Daniel Bell
* David Ben-Gurion
* Eduard Bernstein
* Rubén Berríos
* Hermes Binner
* Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister (1997-2007)
* Léon Blum
* Rodrigo Borja Cevallos
* Willy Brandt
* Hjalmar Branting
* Leonel Brizola
* Ed Broadbent
* Gro Harlem Brundtland
* Gordon Brown, former British Prime Minister (2007-2010)
* Vince Cable
* Fernando Henrique Cardoso
* Ingvar Carlsson
* Helen Clark
* Major James Coldwell
* Gilberto Concepción de Gracia
* Job Cohen
* Brendan Corish
* Mário Covas
* Juan Dalmau Ramírez
* Fedor Dan
* Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva
*
*
* Elio Di Rupo
* Milorad Dodik, Prime Minister of Republic of Srpska
* Tommy Douglas
* Ruth Dreifuss
* Bülent Ecevit
* Tage Erlander
* Mauricio Funes, Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front candidate for the Salvadoran presidential election, 2009
* Carlos Garaikoetxea
* Einar Gerhardsen
* Anthony Giddens
* Eamon Gilmore
* Felipe Gonzalez
* Mikhail Gorbachev
* Zita Gurmai
* Per Albin Hansson
* Sheikh Hasina
* Bob Hawke
* L. T. Hobhouse
* J. A. Hobson
* Toomas Hendrik Ilves
* John Hume
* Ion Iliescu
* Erdal Inonu
* Jean Jaurès
* Roy Jenkins
* Lionel Jospin
* Paul Keating
* Friedrich Kellner
* Norman Kirk
* Wim Kok
* Bruno Kreisky
* Etbin Kristan
* Dennis Kucinich
* Robert Kuttner
*
* Oskar Lafontaine
* Ricardo Lagos
* Ferdinand Lassalle
* Mark Latham
* James Laxer
* Jack Layton
* Julius Leber
* René Lévesque
* David Lewis
* Anna Lindh
* Paavo Lipponen
* Ramsay Macdonald
* Nelson Mandela
* Julius Martov
* Golda Meir
* Dom Mintoff
* Ralph Nader
* Andreas Papandreou
* José Francisco Peña Gómez
* Göran Persson
* Louis Pio
* Georgi Plekhanov
* Karl Polanyi
* Victor Ponta, Prime Minister of Romania
*
*
* Poul Nyrup Rasmussen
* J. J. Rawlings
* August Rei
* Bill Rodgers
* Ségolène Royal
* Manuel Rosales
* Mona Sahlin
* Alex Salmond
* Bernie Sanders
* Giuseppe Saragat
* Michael Joseph Savage
* Wim Schermerhorn
* Gerhard Schröder
* Hans Schultz
* Max Shachtman
* Lim Kit Siang
* Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir
* Karpal Singh
* Dick Spring
* Thorvald Stauning
* Jens Stoltenberg
* Dominique Strauss-Kahn
* Norman Thomas
* Pierre Trudeau
* Gough Whitlam
* Shirley Williams
* Joop den Uyl
* J. S. Woodsworth
* José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero
* Vera Zasulich
* Frank Zeidler, mayor of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (largest U.S. city to have a Socialist mayor)
</div>
Hoard magazine was an online art and culture magazine which was published from 2000 until 2006. The publication featured works of various genres and mediums such as photography, painting, mixed media, experimental film, video art and creative writing. The online collection also included essays, art analysis, and interviews with artists.
Hoard magazine featured artists of varying levels of popular success, but placed a primary focus on independent, underground, and new artists. The digital magazine was produced in San Francisco, California. Hoard Magazine's creator and editor was Vivian Giourousis, and Hoard magazine had its own theme song titled, , created by French internet-pop musician, Manella. Hoard magazine featured the work of artists such as: John John Jesse, Ray Caesar, Hassan Kinley, Danielle Bedics, Kate & Camille, Ryan Pfluger, Rene Capone, Claudio Parentela, Peter Max Lawrence, Lisa Alisa, Antonio Riello, Steven Barich, and Jean Van Cleemput, among others.
Writers published in Hoard magazine included Craig Philips, who writes about film and cinema for GreenCine, and Don Shewey, who has written for The New York Times and The Village Voice.
As presented on its website, Hoard magazine described itself in the following manner: "A hoard is something you accumulate over time. It is something you keep stashed away and usually hidden. A hoard can be a secret treasure or it can be a load of junk. This magazine is called HOARD for that reason. HOARD MAGAZINE was established December 2000, and was created to serve as an online venue for art and culture. Since the turn of the latest century, HOARD has become a familiar and well connected cross roads in the vast and ever growing web of the online arts community. An artist, regardless of where they may be in the grand spectrum of success, understands the importance of sharing expression and reaching an audience who will watch, look, and listen. HOARD understands this too, and knows that the world wide stage can never be big enough. That's why HOARD offers itself as a platform, a ladder, a stepping stone, a bridge, a light socket, an outlet, a fire escape, a conduit. HOARD says, 'Digital killed the video star'. HOARD is composed of curated submissions as well as original content you will only see in our magazine. Sometimes artists come to us, and sometimes they accept our invitation. So far, it has been a process of mutual courtship and attraction."
The spirit of DIY culture, in combination with the common accessibility of the internet during the years of the Dot-com bubble, inspired an outpouring of independent and alternative media sources. Hoard magazine is considered one of the most active and connected independent new media magazines covering art and urban culture during the earliest part of the 21st century.
Remaining content
Hoard magazine is no longer online, but portions of its content are still documented at www.archive.org.
Hoard magazine featured artists of varying levels of popular success, but placed a primary focus on independent, underground, and new artists. The digital magazine was produced in San Francisco, California. Hoard Magazine's creator and editor was Vivian Giourousis, and Hoard magazine had its own theme song titled, , created by French internet-pop musician, Manella. Hoard magazine featured the work of artists such as: John John Jesse, Ray Caesar, Hassan Kinley, Danielle Bedics, Kate & Camille, Ryan Pfluger, Rene Capone, Claudio Parentela, Peter Max Lawrence, Lisa Alisa, Antonio Riello, Steven Barich, and Jean Van Cleemput, among others.
Writers published in Hoard magazine included Craig Philips, who writes about film and cinema for GreenCine, and Don Shewey, who has written for The New York Times and The Village Voice.
As presented on its website, Hoard magazine described itself in the following manner: "A hoard is something you accumulate over time. It is something you keep stashed away and usually hidden. A hoard can be a secret treasure or it can be a load of junk. This magazine is called HOARD for that reason. HOARD MAGAZINE was established December 2000, and was created to serve as an online venue for art and culture. Since the turn of the latest century, HOARD has become a familiar and well connected cross roads in the vast and ever growing web of the online arts community. An artist, regardless of where they may be in the grand spectrum of success, understands the importance of sharing expression and reaching an audience who will watch, look, and listen. HOARD understands this too, and knows that the world wide stage can never be big enough. That's why HOARD offers itself as a platform, a ladder, a stepping stone, a bridge, a light socket, an outlet, a fire escape, a conduit. HOARD says, 'Digital killed the video star'. HOARD is composed of curated submissions as well as original content you will only see in our magazine. Sometimes artists come to us, and sometimes they accept our invitation. So far, it has been a process of mutual courtship and attraction."
The spirit of DIY culture, in combination with the common accessibility of the internet during the years of the Dot-com bubble, inspired an outpouring of independent and alternative media sources. Hoard magazine is considered one of the most active and connected independent new media magazines covering art and urban culture during the earliest part of the 21st century.
Remaining content
Hoard magazine is no longer online, but portions of its content are still documented at www.archive.org.